Logo image
Back
Birth Morbidity and Readmissions in Autistic People and People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities
Abstract   Open access   Peer reviewed

Birth Morbidity and Readmissions in Autistic People and People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Jessica E. Rast, Arina Chesnokova, Jennifer Bromberg and Lindsay L. Shea
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, v 230(1), pp S309-S309
Jan 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.595
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.595View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze),  Open

Abstract

Objective Emerging research suggests people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) have fertility rates similar to the general population. However, studies have highlighted riskier delivery outcomes, including premature delivery and cesarean section, in this group. The objective of this study was to establish prevalence of adverse delivery outcomes, including hospital readmission, in people with autism, other IDDs, and without autism or IDD. Study Design We used the National Readmission Database (NRD), an all-payer collection of inpatient hospital records, from 2019 and 2020 to examine deliveries. NRD (from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project) is sampled from 97% of all hospital discharges in the U.S. We compared people with autism, other IDD, and all other deliveries along antepartum (gestational diabetes), intrapartum (mode of delivery (vaginal, assisted vaginal, cesarean), hemorrhage, preeclampsia and eclampsia), and postpartum (prolonged hospital stay during delivery, readmission within 7 and 30 days of discharge) outcomes. We also examined patient characteristics including Medicaid insurance. Results Some outcomes were more common in people with autism and IDD, including preeclampsia (12% autism, 14% IDD, 7% other), instrumental delivery (39% autism, 47% IDD, 36% other), and stays longer than 5 days (7% autism, 9% IDD, 3% other). All-cause readmission within 30 days was also more common (3% autism, 6% IDD, 1% other). There was no difference in rate of cesarean section. Medicaid coverage was common in autistic people (59%) and people with IDD (52%), compared to 41% of other deliveries. Conclusion This study highlights disparities in delivery outcomes of a demographic that is largely missing from pregnancy care and research. These disparities are likely further exacerbated by other social determinants of health, including race and ethnicity. Individual and structural factors including patient, clinician, and health system factors are all at play and need to be examined to better understand and adapt care delivery to this population.

Metrics

14 Record Views

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Logo image