Annotation
Comment & Response : Laryngeal Tube Insertion vs Endotracheal Intubation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, Vol.321(1), pp.105-105
Amer Medical Assoc
01 Jan 2019
PMID: 30620364
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
To the Editor Dr Wang and colleagues1 found that a strategy of initial laryngeal tube (LT) insertion vs endotracheal intubation (ETI) in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) was associated with greater survival. We have some concerns regarding the results and the applicability of the conclusions. [1st paragraph]
Metrics
1 Record Views
Details
- Title
- Comment & Response : Laryngeal Tube Insertion vs Endotracheal Intubation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
- Creators
- Liang Huang - Drexel UniversityCarin Hagberg - The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHenry Liu - Drexel Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Perioperat Med, Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- Publication Details
- JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association, Vol.321(1), pp.105-105
- Publisher
- Amer Medical Assoc
- Number of pages
- 1
- Resource Type
- Annotation
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Identifiers
- 991021860805504721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This output has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
These are selected metrics from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool, related to this output
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Medicine, General & Internal