Logo image
DISCLOSURE VERSUS RECOGNITION IN STOCK-OPTION REPORTING: ARE SOPHISTICATED USERS' PERCEPTIONS AND JUDGMENTS INFLUENCED BY THE REPORTING FORMAT?
Book chapter

DISCLOSURE VERSUS RECOGNITION IN STOCK-OPTION REPORTING: ARE SOPHISTICATED USERS' PERCEPTIONS AND JUDGMENTS INFLUENCED BY THE REPORTING FORMAT?

Asokan Anandarajan, Rejean Belzile, Anthony P. Curatola and Chantal Viger
Advances in accounting behavioral research, pp 31-57
01 Jan 2008

Abstract

Business Business & Economics Management Psychology Psychology, Multidisciplinary Social Sciences
The recently passed Statement Financial of Accounting Standard (SFAS) 123R mandates that stock-option compensation costs be recognized in the income statement. This supersedes SFAS 148 and the earlier SFAS 123 which required only disclosure in the notes to the financial statements. The motivation of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) was to increase transparency in reporting of financial statements. The objective of this chapter is to test whether sophisticated users' perceptions and judgments are affected by the different reporting format that has been mandated by SFAS 123R. Members of the Institute of Management Accountants (IMA) were used as the participants in this study. The study finds a (1) higher perceived risk, (2) lower expected accounting return, (3) more pessimistic overall perception, (4) more negative future stock price direction, and (5) lower stock price valuation by sophisticated users in the presence of recognition versus disclosure. These findings support the stance of the FASB and indicate that that information content is accentuated in the presence of recognition relative to disclosure.

Metrics

8 Record Views
3 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Business
Management
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
Logo image