Logo image
Recommendations for Law and Policy, Practice, and Research
Book chapter

Recommendations for Law and Policy, Practice, and Research

Kirk Heilbrun, David DeMatteo, Christopher King and Sarah Filone
Evaluating Juvenile Transfer and Disposition
2017

Abstract

Criminal Court Judges Forensic Mental Health Juvenile System Behavioral Health Symptoms Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care Mental Health Courts Juvenile Justice Young Adult Offenders Criminogenic Risk Juvenile Court Behavioral Health Assessment Forensic Mental Health Assessment Forensic Mental Health Professionals Reverse Transfer Behavioral Health Problems Criminal Justice Mental Health Standards Behavioral Health Criminal System Convey Risk Information Reducing Recidivism Risk Parole Sentences Clinical Forensic Psychologist Juvenile Disposition Adult Correctional Systems Risk Relevant Information
The evaluation of justice-involved youth on the issues of disposition and transfer has seen substantial progress in relevance and reliability, particularly in the last two decades. There is a clear legal trend, seen in the US Supreme Court decisions in Roper, Graham, Miller, and Montgomery, away from mandated decisions and toward discretionary, individualized consideration in decisions regarding juveniles. An important advance in the assessment of risk and needs in justice-involved youth during the last decade has involved the increased awareness of the potential impact of trauma and adverse experience on risk of re-offending. The development of model law, ethical guidelines, and practice guidelines is a useful function of national organizations and more specialized organizations. Juvenile forensic evaluation requires specialized training, knowledge, and skills. The outcome that is most consistent with juvenile law and precedent involves re-offending. The availability of relevant psychological tests that are valid for juvenile assessment purposes is helpful.

Metrics

11 Record Views

Details

Logo image