Logo image
Are anonymity-seekers just like everybody else? An analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from Tor
Conference proceeding   Open access

Are anonymity-seekers just like everybody else? An analysis of contributions to Wikipedia from Tor

Chau Tran, Kaylea Champion, Andrea Forte, Benjamin Mako Hill, Rachel Greenstadt and IEEE
2020 IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (SP 2020), v 2020-
01 Jan 2020
url
https://doi.org/10.1109/sp40000.2020.00053View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open
url
https://doi.org/10.1109/SP40000.2020.00053View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Computer Science Computer Science, Information Systems Computer Science, Theory & Methods Engineering Engineering, Electrical & Electronic Science & Technology Technology
User-generated content sites routinely block contributions from users of privacy-enhancing proxies like Tor because of a perception that proxies are a source of vandalism, spam, and abuse. Although these blocks might be effective, collateral damage in the form of unrealized valuable contributions from anonymity seekers is invisible. One of the largest and most important user-generated content sites, Wikipedia, has attempted to block contributions from Tor users since as early as 2005. We demonstrate that these blocks have been imperfect and that thousands of attempts to edit on Wikipedia through Tor have been successful. We draw upon several data sources and analytical techniques to measure and describe the history of Tor editing on Wikipedia over time and to compare contributions from Tor users to those from other groups of Wikipedia users. Our analysis suggests that although Tor users who slip through Wikipedia's ban contribute content that is more likely to be reverted and to revert others, their contributions are otherwise similar in quality to those from other unregistered participants and to the initial contributions of registered users.

Metrics

9 Record Views
8 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Information Systems
Computer Science, Theory & Methods
Engineering, Electrical & Electronic
Logo image