Logo image
Comparing Two Approaches to Studying Communications in Team Design
Conference proceeding

Comparing Two Approaches to Studying Communications in Team Design

Hao Jiang and John S. Gero
Design Computing and Cognition '16, pp 301-319
01 Jan 2017

Abstract

Computer Science Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence Computer Science, Theory & Methods Life Sciences & Biomedicine Neurosciences Neurosciences & Neurology Science & Technology Technology
This paper explores intragroup communication in team design using data collected from a protocol study. Two units of analysis are introduced, (1) at a coarse level: turn-taking of utterances during conversations, and (2) at a fine level: design issues on the basis of the FBS ontologically-based coding scheme. These basic elements of team design activities (i.e., conversational turns and design issues) are then interconnected using Goldschmidt's Linkography method. The proposed two methods are demonstrated and compared through a case study of product design meeting. Results indicate that, for the purpose of structure-based analysis, the measurements derived from the turn-taking model are able to largely resemble the measurements derived from the FBS-based model, though the former model could be achieved with much less labor than the latter model. However, content-based analysis could only be conducted by using the more sophisticated FBS-based method.

Metrics

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science, Theory & Methods
Neurosciences
Logo image