Logo image
Epistemic Games Analysis of Common Exam Questions Across Course Formats
Conference proceeding   Open access

Epistemic Games Analysis of Common Exam Questions Across Course Formats

Jonathan V. Mahadeo, Adrienne Traxler and Eric Brewe
2013 PHYSICS EDUCATION RESEARCH CONFERENCE, pp 241-244
01 Jan 2013
url
https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2013.pr.048View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Education & Educational Research Education, Scientific Disciplines Physical Sciences Physics Physics, Multidisciplinary Science & Technology Social Sciences
This study investigates differences in problem-solving performance between three different introductory physics course formats at Florida International University. The course formats-lecture+laboratory (LL), inquiry-based (IQB), and lecture+laboratory+recitation (LLR)-all incorporated two Advanced Placement (AP) questions into their final exams. Students' written responses were evaluated via an AP scoring rubric, and during this scoring, we observed marked differences in solution behavior between the three course formats. To further investigate these differences, we used the framework of epistemic games to analyze student responses. To apply this framework to written work, an epistemic game rubric was created. Application of this rubric yielded game profiles for each of the course formats, allowing us to highlight and compare course characteristics. These profiles of epistemic game distributions were then examined via chi-squared tests to quantify differences in the tools and strategies students used in their solutions.

Metrics

12 Record Views

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Education & Educational Research
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Physics, Multidisciplinary
Logo image