Conference proceeding
HOW VERIDICAL ARE DIFFERENT MODALITIES OF DIGITAL REPRESENTATION?: LIVING SYSTEMS AND MICRO-UTOPIAS: TOWARDS CONTINUOUS DESIGNING
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN RESEARCH IN ASIA (CAADRIA 2016), pp 861-870
01 Jan 2016
Abstract
This paper presents the methodology and results of a pilot study comparing the eye movements of architecture students when looking at different modalities of digital spatial representation. The two participant groups consisted of third and fourth year undergraduate architecture students from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, USA and from Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China. The two modalities studied were a computer-generated line drawn perspective and a digitized photograph of the same architectural space. The results of this study show that student designers' physiological response varies with different representation modalities.
Metrics
1 Record Views
Details
- Title
- HOW VERIDICAL ARE DIFFERENT MODALITIES OF DIGITAL REPRESENTATION?
- Creators
- John S. Gero - George Mason UniversityJennifer Shields - Calif Polytech State Univ San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407 USARongrong Yu - Northeast Forestry University
- Contributors
- S F Chien (Editor)S Choo (Editor)M A Schnabel (Editor)W Nakapan (Editor)M J Kim (Editor)S Roudavski (Editor)
- Publication Details
- PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN RESEARCH IN ASIA (CAADRIA 2016), pp 861-870
- Publisher
- Caadria-Assoc Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research Asia
- Number of pages
- 10
- Resource Type
- Conference proceeding
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000385790700084
- Other Identifier
- 991022202061204721