Logo image
Semantically Far Inspirations Considered Harmful?: Accounting for Cognitive States in Collaborative Ideation
Conference proceeding   Open access

Semantically Far Inspirations Considered Harmful?: Accounting for Cognitive States in Collaborative Ideation

Joel Chan, Pao Siangliulue, Denisa Qori McDonald, Ruixue Liu, Reza Moradinezhad, Safa Aman, Erin Solovey, Krzysztof Gajos and Steven Dow
Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on creativity and cognition, pp 93-105
22 Jun 2017
url
https://doi.org/10.1145/3059454.3059455View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

brainstorming collaborative ideation creativity creativity support tools examples
Collaborative ideation systems can help people generate more creative ideas by exposing them to ideas different from their own. However, there are competing theoretical views on whether and when such exposure is helpful. Associationist theory suggests that exposing ideators to ideas that are semantically far from their own maximizes novel combinations of ideas. In contrast, SIAM theory cautions that systems should offer far ideas only when ideators reach an impasse (a cognitive state in which they have exhausted ideas within a particular category), and offer near ideas during productive ideation (a cognitive state in which they are actively exploring ideas within a category), which maximizes exploration within categories. Our research compares these theoretical recommendations. In an online experiment, 245 participants generated ideas for a themed wedding; we detected and validated participants' cognitive states using a combination of behavioral and neuroimaging data. Receiving far ideas during productive ideation resulted in slower ideation and less within-category exploration, without significant benefits for novelty, compared to receiving no inspirations. Participants were also more likely to hit an impasse when receiving far ideas during productive ideation. These findings suggest that far inspirational ideas can harm creativity if received during productive ideation.

Metrics

20 Record Views
49 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Art
Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
Logo image