Logo image
Additional file 1 of An updated analysis of safety climate and downstream outcomes in two convenience samples of U.S. fire departments (FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0 survey waves)
Dataset   Open access

Additional file 1 of An updated analysis of safety climate and downstream outcomes in two convenience samples of U.S. fire departments (FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0 survey waves)

Ashley M. Geczik, Jin Lee, Joseph A. Allen, Madison E. Raposa, Lucy F. Robinson, D. Alex Quistberg, Andrea L. Davis and Jennifer A. Taylor
22 May 2024
url
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25876059View

Abstract

FOS: Biological sciences FOS: Chemical sciences FOS: Health sciences FOS: Sociology Medicine Ecology Infectious Diseases Inorganic Chemistry Molecular Biology Sociology
Additional file 1: Supplemental Table 1. Linear regression models examining the relationship between safety climate scores and safety behaviors/organizational outcomes for FOCUS 1.0 and FOCUS 2.0, adjusting for organization type. Supplemental Table 2. Multilevel logistic regression between safety climate and injury status for FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0, adjusting for organization type. Supplemental Table 3. Linear regression models examining the relationship between safety climate scores and safety behaviors/organizational outcomes for FOCUS 1.0 and FOCUS 2.0 overall and stratified by organization type, excluding departments that have assessed with FOCUS more than once. Supplemental Table 4. Multilevel logistic regression between safety climate and injury status among individuals stratified by organization type for FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0, excluding departments that have assessed with FOCUS more than once. Supplemental Table 5. Linear regression models examining the relationship between safety climate scores and safety behaviors/organizational outcomes for FOCUS 1.0 and FOCUS 2.0 overall and stratified by organization type, excluding departments with <60% response rate. Supplemental Table 6. Multilevel logistic regression between safety climate and injury status among individuals stratified by organization type for FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0, excluding departments with <60% response rate. Supplemental Table 7. Descriptive characteristics of FOCUS 1.0 and 2.0 analytic sample stratified by fire department organization type, for comparison between departments that assessed before and during the U.S. COVID-19 response. Supplemental Table 8. Linear regression models examining the relationship between safety climate scores and safety behaviors/organizational outcomes for FOCUS 2.0 overall and stratified by organization type, for comparison between departments that assessed before and during the U.S. COVID-19 response. Supplemental Table 9. Multilevel logistic regression between safety climate and injury status among individuals stratified by organization type for FOCUS 2.0, for comparison between departments that assessed before and during the U.S. COVID-19 response.

Metrics

26 Record Views

Details

Logo image