Logo image
Do juvenile probation officer recommendations mediate the relationship between youth behaviors and supervision review hearing outcomes?
Dissertation   Open access

Do juvenile probation officer recommendations mediate the relationship between youth behaviors and supervision review hearing outcomes?

Elizabeth Wyatt Gale-Bentz
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Drexel University
May 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17918/k8w6-mg95
pdf
Gale-Bentz_Elizabeth_2019826.07 kBDownloadView

Abstract

Juvenile probation Juvenile justice, Administration of--Decision making Clinical Psychology Psychology
While under community-based court supervision, youths' (non)compliant behaviors are monitored by juvenile probation officers (JPOs), who provide recommendations to the court about whether youths' levels of supervision should be increased, decreased, or remain the same. The current study examined the extent to which JPOs' recommendations influenced judges' decisions at review hearings (N = 775) in a mid-Atlantic jurisdiction, and whether JPOs' recommendations varied by youth demographic characteristics (i.e., race/ethnicity, gender, age). Binomial multilevel mediation analyses, conducted using the lme4 and mediation packages in RStudio, indicated that JPOs' recommendations mediated the relationship between youths' noncompliance and judges' orders to decrease levels of supervision relative to increasing or maintaining current levels. JPOs' recommendations did not mediate the relationship between youths' noncompliance and judges' orders to increase supervision levels relative to keeping youth at their current levels. Moderated multilevel mediation analyses revealed that youths' race/ethnicity impacted the relationship between noncompliance and JPOs' recommendations to decrease supervision relative to maintaining current levels; White youth were less likely than youth of racial minority status to receive recommendations for reductions in supervision. Youths' age and gender did not appear to impact JPOs' decision making. Findings suggest that JPOs' recommendations played an important role in judges' decision making in some, but not all, contexts and that some JPOs' recommendations depended on youths' race/ethnicity. Policy and practice considerations regarding consistent decision making in the context of current probation transformation efforts, as well as directions for future research (e.g., whether the nature or extent of noncompliant behaviors drive judges' decisions), are offered.

Metrics

82 File views/ downloads
64 Record Views

Details

Logo image