Corporate governance should benefit from increasing board involvement in the strategic decision process (SDP). However, little is known about board participation in this process. Power and politics between board members and executive directors in the SDP are studied using 140 senior officers in 17 Arts, Cultural, and Historical organizations in the Philadelphia-Delaware Valley area. Examined are two sets of relationships. The first set is between power (i.e. influence) and politics (i.e. collaborative or competitive behaviors) in five phases of the SDP (issue identification, alternative development, alternative evaluation and choice, implementation, and evaluation of results). Executive directors and board members share power; no relationships between power and politics are found. The second set of relationships is between politics and six outcome measures (quality, speed, goal achievement, average working capital, average working capital ratio, and unrestricted funds). Quality and speed are strongly related to collaborative politics; goal achievement and unrestricted funds are weakly associated with collaborative politics. I find no relationships between politics and either working capital measure.
Metrics
14 File views/ downloads
26 Record Views
Details
Title
Executive/board power and politics in strategic decision making
Creators
Claire A. Simmers
Contributors
Sidney W. Hess (Advisor) - Drexel University, Drexel University (1970-)
Awarding Institution
Drexel University
Degree Awarded
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Publisher
Drexel University; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Number of pages
xi, 228 pages
Resource Type
Dissertation
Language
English
Academic Unit
College of Business (and) Administration (1970-1999); Drexel University
Other Identifier
991021888992504721
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services