Parents' reactions to two Pennsylvania commitment laws for minors: a procedural justice analysis
Trudi Zaplac
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University
Dec 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17918/00010107
Files and links (1)
pdf
Zaplac_Trudi_19983.71 MB
PDF Restricted Access, VIEWABLE UPON REQUEST: contact archives@drexel.edu
Abstract
Psychology
One hundred twenty-eight adult residents of Pennsylvania completed a brief opinion questionnaire on procedural justice aspects of two commitment laws for minors. The Mental Health Commitment (MHC) law allowed parental control over the commitment decision. The Substance Abuse Commitment (SAC) law required judicial control over the commitment decision. Subjects found the parental control-MHC law to be more fair than the judicial control-SAC law. Subjects were more satisfied with an unfavorable outcome (denial of commitment) under the parental control-MHC law than they were with an unfavorable outcome under the judicial control-SAC law. Multiple regression analyses indicated that when the effect of control over outcome was controlled statistically, perceptions of fairness were determined by elements of procedural justice theory (voice, neutrality of decision-maker, and respect/dignity afforded parents). Neither control over outcome nor procedural justice theory was a significant predictor of satisfaction with an unfavorable outcome under either law. Findings suggest that procedural justice theory does not explain reactions to parent-child disputes as well as it explains other kinds of disputes. These results support the application of procedural justice theory to perceptions of fairness, but not to satisfaction with unfavorable outcomes in parent-child disputes that are subjected to resolution by a third party decision-maker.
Metrics
8 Record Views
Details
Title
Parents' reactions to two Pennsylvania commitment laws for minors
Creators
Trudi Zaplac
Awarding Institution
Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University
Degree Awarded
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Publisher
Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Number of pages
vii, 87 pages
Resource Type
Dissertation
Language
English
Academic Unit
Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University (1993-1996, 1998-2002); Clinical and Health Psychology [Historical]; School of Health Professions (1998-2000)
Other Identifier
991021888844704721
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services