This dissertation purposes a practice-oriented framework for the role of the lawyer/clinical psychologist (LCP) in consultation to the legal profession. It reviews the psychological perspective on lawyers and the legal profession, spotlighting the effects of alcoholism in the legal profession and both legal and psychological attempts to remedy those effects. Theoretical and practical aspects of the role of the psychologist as mental health consultant are examined. Differences in psychological type among three categories of lawyers (271 practicing lawyers, 128 Judges, and 84 administrative Attorneys) are examined with the use of archival data from administrations of the Myers-Briggs Type Inventory. Results confirm predictions derived from the psychological literature, that differing prevalences of personality type and aspects of personality type can be discerned for each of the specializations, with an overall emphasis on thinking at the expense of feeling, and an overall prevalence of combinations of thinking and judging. Relevance to psycholegal consultation by LCPs and implications for future research are discussed.
Metrics
15 Record Views
Details
Title
Psychological type
Creators
Eric York Drogin
Contributors
Marshall Swift (Advisor) - Drexel University, Hahnemann University (1982-1993)
Awarding Institution
Hahnemann University; Villanova University, School of Law
Degree Awarded
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Publisher
Hahnemann University; Villanova University, School of Law; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Number of pages
viii, 180 pages
Resource Type
Dissertation
Language
English
Academic Unit
Hahnemann University (1982-1993); Mental Health (Technology/Sciences) [Historical]; School of Health Sciences and Humanities (1988-1993); Psychology [Historical]
Other Identifier
991021888831604721
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services