Reliability and third party informants: factors influencing ward staff observations of symptom genuineness
Judith Philipson
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.), Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University
Aug 1999
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17918/00009413
Files and links (1)
pdf
Philipson_Judith_19994.26 MB
PDF Restricted Access, VIEWABLE UPON REQUEST: contact archives@drexel.edu
Abstract
Psychology
This study addressed the use of third party information in criminal forensic assessment. The perceptions of direct care staff in a forensic hospital regarding the genuineness of patient symptoms were explored. Staff (N = 108) were asked to rate eight case vignettes in which the patient variables of prior psychiatric history, cooperativeness with staff, and inconsistency across observations were systematically manipulated within a 2 x 2 x 2 within-subjects design. Results indicated that prior psychiatric history and behavioral inconsistency were significantly related to staff perceptions of symptom genuineness, but uncooperativeness was not.
Metrics
13 Record Views
Details
Title
Reliability and third party informants
Creators
Judith Philipson
Contributors
Kirk Heilbrun (Advisor) - Drexel University, Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University (1993-1996, 1998-2002)
Awarding Institution
Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University
Degree Awarded
Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.)
Publisher
Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Number of pages
vii, 104 pages
Resource Type
Dissertation
Language
English
Academic Unit
Medical College of Pennsylvania and Hahnemann University (1993-1996, 1998-2002); Clinical and Health Psychology [Historical]; School of Health Professions (1998-2000)
Other Identifier
991021888780704721
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services