Comparing subharmonic imaging and immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis

Aditi Gupta

doi:10.17918/00008255

This work examines angiogenesis associated with the growth of tumors and metastasis. The process of pathologic angiogenesis (neovascularization) can be broken down into three main steps: 1) activation 2) migration and 3) proliferation of endothelial cells. Development of techniques that can measure the functional and structural properties of tumor vascularity at different stages during progression of the tumor, is therefore, imperative for monitoring and controlling the spread of cancer. Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging has the capability of scanning in real-time without fear of radiation. Contrast agents are composed of gas-filled microbubbles, which exhibit nonlinear scattering when insonified by an ultrasound beam. This leads to the emission of harmonic components of the fundamental signal in the received echoes. The component emitted at half of the fundamental frequency (f₀/2) is called the subharmonic component, and is used in this study as it provides an improved contrast-to-tissue-ratio for ultrasound imaging of tumor angiogenesis. Pre-clinical and clinical ultrasound imaging studies of tumor angiogenesis are often conducted with pathological markers as the reference standard. There is, however, no established standard for how to analyze specimen markers and compare them to imaging parameters. Hence, the purpose of this study was to compare different methods for obtaining tumor neovascularity parameters based on immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis and compare those to contrast-enhanced subharmonic ultrasound imaging (SHI) in a murine xenograft model. Eighty-five athymic, nude, female rats were implanted with 5 x 10⁶ breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231) in the mammary fat pad. The ultrasound contrast agent Defmity (Lantheus Medical Imaging, N Billerica, MA) was injected in a tail vein (dose: 36 [mu]l) and pulse-inversion SHI was performed using a modified (able to perform pulse-inversion subharmonic imaging) Sonix RP scanner (Analogic Ultrasound, Richmond, BC, Canada) with a L9-4 linear array. Transmitting and receiving frequencies used were 8 and 4 MHz, respectively. These frequencies were selected as they fall in the frequency band of the transducer and can be used clinically for breast imaging, since the ultimate goal is to use the monitoring of angiogenesis for human breast cancer studies. After the experiments, tumor specimens were sliced corresponding to the imaging planes and stained for endothelial cells (CD31), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). Tumor neovascularity was assessed in 4 different ways using a histomophometry system based on a Labophot-2 microscope (Nikon, Melville, NJ) at 100x magnification 1) over the entire tumor, 2) in small sub-regions of interest (ROIs), 3) in the tumor periphery (within 2 mm of the margin) and centrally, and 4) in regions of maximum marker expression (so called hotspots). Results from the specimens and from SHI were compared using linear regression analysis. Of the 85 rats implanted 54 (64 %) exhibited tumor growth and 38 were successfully imaged. SHI depicted the tortuous morphology of tumor neovessels and delineated small areas of necrosis. SHI measures of tumor vascularity did not correlate with the immunohistochemical markers when assessed over the entire tumor area (p > 0.60) or over the small sub-ROIs (p > 0.18). However, when the specimens were sub-dived into a central and a peripheral region, COX-2 and VEGF was found to correlate with SHI in the periphery (r = -0.42 with p = 0.005 and r = -0.32 with p = 0.049, respectively). Another correlation in this breast cancer model was seen between SHI and COX-2 in the hotspots of the tumors (r = 0.25; p = 0.007). The results indicate that, when comparing quantitative contrast measures of tumor neovascularity to immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in xenograft models it appears that sub-ROIs corresponding to the biologically active region (i.e., the tumor periphery) should be used to account for tumor heterogeneity and development.

Comparing subharmonic imaging and immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis

Files and links (1)

Abstract

Metrics

Details

Comparing subharmonic imaging and immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis

Files and links (1)

Abstract

Metrics

Details

Drexel University Social media