Comparison of PM 2.5 Samplers in Residential Environments
Shannon Widman
Master of Public Health (M.P.H.), Drexel University
May 2010
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17918/etd-3607
Files and links (1)
pdf
Widman_Shannon_20101.47 MB
PDF Restricted Access, VIEWABLE UPON REQUEST: contact archives@drexel.edu
Abstract
PM2.5 Residential Environments Public Health
Background: Research has shown that long-term exposure to particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 micrometers or less can result in adverse health effects including changes in respiratory function and in cardiopulmonary morbidity and mortality. This study sought to investigate potential contributors to heightened PM 2.5 concentrations in the home and to compare two PM 2.5 samplers that are commercially available and commonly used. Methods: This experimental study was performed in the homes of thirty-one Drexel-affiliated participants. The Sioutas Cascade Impactor (SKC Inc., Eighty Four, PA) and the Personal Environmental Monitor (PEM-SKC Inc., Eighty Four, PA) were run side-by-side for eight hours in the homes of the participants; PM 2.5 concentrations for each sampler were calculated following sampling. The resultant PM 2.5 concentrations were log-transformed to attain normality. A questionnaire was administered to gather data on housing characteristics and possible contributors to heightened PM 2.5 concentrations. Associations between contributors and observed PM 2.5 concentrations were assessed. Results: Variability between the Sioutas Cascade Impactor and the Personal Environmental Monitor was found to be statistically significant (p=0.015). The PEM was found to measure an average of two times higher PM 2.5 concentrations than the Sioutas, when sampling in the same environment. No statistical significance was observed among residences exhibiting different housing characteristics (p>0.05). Conclusions: The Sioutas appears to underestimate PM 2.5 concentrations, while the PEM measures higher PM 2.5 concentration in the same environment. It would be beneficial for this study to be expanded and continued, with samples taken in a larger number of homes in order to confirm the association. Additionally, it would be beneficial to use two of each sampler for comparison purposes.
Metrics
7 File views/ downloads
16 Record Views
Details
Title
Comparison of PM 2.5 Samplers in Residential Environments
Creators
Shannon Widman - DU
Contributors
Curtis E. Cummings (Advisor) - Drexel University (1970-)
Awarding Institution
Drexel University
Degree Awarded
Master of Public Health (M.P.H.)
Publisher
Drexel University; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Resource Type
Thesis
Language
English
Academic Unit
School of Public Health (2002-2015); Drexel University
Other Identifier
3607; 991014632308104721
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services