Logo image
Intent, context, content: a public art comparative case study
Thesis   Open access

Intent, context, content: a public art comparative case study

Tracy Buchanan
Master of Science (M.S.), Drexel University
2014
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17918/etd-6271
pdf
Buchanan_Tracy_2014727.01 kBDownloadView

Abstract

Arts--Management Public art Pennsylvania--Philadelphia Mural Arts Program (Philadelphia, Pa.) Association for Public Art
Few arts organizations in the Philadelphia region have had more long term successes than the Association for Public Art (formally the Fairmount Park Arts Association) and the Mural Arts Program. Their stamina, innovation and strategic thinking have given them a place on the world stage and helped to position Philadelphia as an exceptional place for arts and culture. They both come to their work from very different points of reference and produce works of public art with vastly different and distinct aesthetic qualities. This comparative case study examines the Association for Public Art and the Mural Arts Program through the lens of two projects, Open Air and Philly Painting using the framework of intent, context and content. The goal is to understand the organization's motivations, objectives, goals and what, if any similarities and/or differences are present in the work they develop how it is conceived and how they present it. These two projects that ultimately reflect the two organizations have fundamental differences particularly when considering their intentions. However, both share several similarities in the areas of context and content. Similarities found include the projects temporality, collaboration, commission process and the participatory nature of the works themselves.

Metrics

43 File views/ downloads
37 Record Views

Details

Logo image