Logo image
Judges' and potential jurors' perceptions of personality disorders as a mitigating factor in capital sentencing decisions
Thesis   Open access

Judges' and potential jurors' perceptions of personality disorders as a mitigating factor in capital sentencing decisions

Shelby Arnold
Master of Science (M.S.), Drexel University
Jun 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17918/etd-7571
pdf
Arnold_Shelby_2017339.64 kBDownloadView

Abstract

Clinical Psychology
When mental illness is not enough to preclude a defendant from death-eligibility, mental health information presented during the sentencing phase of a capital trial becomes incredibly important. The role of personality disorders as a mitigating factor is missing from the literature, despite high comorbidity rates with criminal behavior. The goal of this study was to examine whether personality disorders are treated differently than other mental illnesses that may be presented as mitigating evidence and if that affects sentencing recommendations. Two samples of 158 judges and 195 mock jurors were each randomized into five conditions. Using vignettes, the defendant's diagnosis (no mental illness, schizophrenia, bipolar I disorder, antisocial personality disorder, or borderline personality disorder) was manipulated. Results showed that judges and mock jurors found schizophrenia to be more mitigating than any other mental health diagnosis, but judges recognized that borderline personality disorder is also mitigating.

Metrics

59 File views/ downloads
39 Record Views

Details

Logo image