Logo image
The role of DIPs and Dprs in synaptic connection specificity
Thesis   Open access

The role of DIPs and Dprs in synaptic connection specificity

Pratishtha Guckhool
Master of Science (M.S.), Drexel University
Jun 2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17918/00001151
pdf
Guckhool_Pratishtha_202211.91 MBDownloadView
xlsx
Guckhool_Pratishtha_2022_Suppl152.26 kBDownloadView
Spreadsheet (supplemental) TPM and cluster indices from K-means Clustering Open Access Open Access (License Unspecified)

Abstract

Drosophila melanogaster Neural circuitry
The precise wiring patterns between neurons are crucial for the proper formation and maintenance of neuronal circuits. Synaptic adhesion molecules are thought to play an important role in the regulation of synaptic connection specificity. The immunoglobulin-like subfamily of synaptic adhesion molecules, the 21-member DIPs and 11-member Dprs have been hypothesized to represent the two families of neuronal recognition proteins in the Drosophila melanogaster model organism. The protein expression previously characterized in the outer layers of the optic lobe has shown that some of the Dprs are broadly expressed in the lamina neurons and their cognate DIPs are expressed in their synaptic target medulla neurons. Here, we investigate the differential gene expression patterns of DIPs and Dprs within the optic glomeruli of the three Lobular Columnar cell types: LC4, LPLC1, and LPLC2. Using a publicly available RNA-seq dataset, we develop and compare multiple analyses pipelines to predict the variation in gene expression levels of each DIP and Dpr across cell types within the visual system and their expression state in a specific cell population. Dpr1/DIP-eta were identified as being more highly expressed in LPLC2, and Dpr9/DIP-beta and Dpr12/DIP-delta in LPLC1. To validate these predictions, we investigate the protein expression patterns of the identified DIPs and Dprs. Endogenous labeling of the DIPs and Dprs shows that the differential gene expression patterns match the protein expression patterns for DIP-eta while the Dprs were not differentially expressed across the optic glomeruli of the three LC cell types. We then sought to identify the DIPs and Dprs that may be involved in synaptic partner recognition during development in the three LC cell types. A differential gene expression analysis identified Dpr1 that is differentially expressed between LC4 and LPLC1 and Dpr13, Dpr20 and DIP-eta between LPLC2 and LPLC1. This work provides a better understanding of the differential expression of the DIPs and Dprs within cell types in the visual system and their potential role in synaptic partner recognition.

Metrics

53 File views/ downloads
58 Record Views

Details

Logo image