Logo image
Back
A Comparison of Simple Mass Estimators for Galaxy Clusters
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A Comparison of Simple Mass Estimators for Galaxy Clusters

Tereasa G Brainerd, Candace Oaxaca Wright, David M Goldberg and Jens Verner Villumsen
The Astrophysical journal, v 524(1), pp 9-21
03 Mar 1999
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/307793
url
https://doi.org/10.1086/307793View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze),  Open

Abstract

Physics - Astrophysics of Galaxies Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics Physics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena Physics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics Physics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
High-resolution N-body simulations are used to investigate systematic trends in the mass profiles and total masses of clusters as derived from 3 simple estimators: (1) the weak gravitational lensing shear field under the assumption of an isothermal cluster potential, (2) the dynamical mass obtained from the measured velocity dispersion under the assumption of an isothermal cluster potential, and (3) the classical virial estimator. The clusters consist of order 2.5e+05 particles of mass $m_p \simeq 10^{10} \Msun$, have triaxial mass distributions, and significant substructure exists within their virial radii. Not surprisingly, the level of agreement between the mass profiles obtained from the various estimators and the actual mass profiles is found to be scale-dependent. The virial estimator yields a good measurement of the total cluster mass, though it is systematically underestimated by of order 10%. This result suggests that, at least in the limit of ideal data, the virial estimator is quite robust to deviations from pure spherical symmetry and the presence of substructure. The dynamical mass estimate based upon a measurement of the cluster velocity dispersion and an assumption of an isothermal potential yields a poor measurement of the total mass. The weak lensing estimate yields a very good measurement of the total mass, provided the mean shear used to determine the equivalent cluster velocity dispersion is computed from an average of the lensing signal over the entire cluster (i.e. the mean shear is computed interior to the virial radius). [abridged]

Metrics

6 Record Views
4 citations in Web of Science
1 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Logo image