Detroit College of Law at Michigan State University Law Review, v 1998, pp 109-174
01 Apr 1998
Files and links (1)
pdf
armonj-DetCLRev109-19983.52 MB
Published, Version of Record (VoR)login to download (DU) or request access (others) Restricted Access
Abstract
allegations fundamental generations introduction paraphrased photocopies professional progression real property law researching spiritually
Introduction: Pleading is rarely taught in law school. Most of you learned to draft complaints on the job. In consequence, complaints heavily mimic those found in office files, which themselves were paraphrased from complaints in other files and from form books. The result is a progression of mediocrity, spiritually akin to succeeding generations of pale grey photocopies. Instead, write a complaint that you yourself would want to read. Let the complaint be a product of your professional judgment. That judgment begins with research. By researching during the drafting of a complaint, you can reinvent the cause of action, shore up the complaint against a demurrer, and avoid scrambling to learn the elements after you have been served with a motion for summary judgment. As my academic readers know, a lawyer should set up his or her authority over the law at the inception of a case. Law students need to be taught ways that law is made not by judges but by the practice of it. This manual is written to suggest such a pedagogy. Drafting a factual complaint entails analysis so fundamental to legal reasoning that it should be taught during the first year. 1 Complaints map the way that lawyers think. Lawyers think in allegations, with the steps in reasoning left implicit. Lawyers list. Lawyers tell the client's story in skeletal form: Here are the basic facts of my client's claim or defense. Yet pleading does not receive the introduction that Legal Writing and Research provides for ...
Metrics
1 File views/ downloads
27 Record Views
Details
Title
A Method for Writing Factual Complaints
Creators
Jan Armon - Drexel University, English and Philosophy
Publication Details
Detroit College of Law at Michigan State University Law Review, v 1998, pp 109-174
Publisher
Detroit College of Law at Michigan State University Law Review
Number of pages
66
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
English and Philosophy
Other Identifier
991021890213604721
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services