A Modified Delphi Study to Establish Essential Clinical Pharmacology Competencies

doi:10.1007/s43441-023-00609-y

IntroductionCompetency-based education has been commonly used to enhance the healthcare workforce for some time. A translational discipline that is integral to drug development and impactful on healthcare and public health is clinical pharmacology. With such contribution, it is essential that the clinical pharmacology workforce is adequately equipped to address the demands of emerging trends of drug development.ObjectivesThe primary objective of this study was to determine the most significant competencies needed for a clinical pharmacologist in the regulatory environment.MethodsA two round modified Delphi technique was administered to 29 clinical pharmacologists within the Office of Clinical Pharmacology (OCP) between November 2021-January 2022.A questionnaire consisting of core and technical competencies was administered electronically using SurveyMonkey (R) to gain consensus about essential clinical pharmacology competencies. Participants used a Likert scale to rank importance of competencies from strongly agree (1), agree (2), neutral (3), disagree (4), strongly disagree (5). Participants also suggested topics to be included in the next round. Consensus was set at 60%. The competencies receiving the most consensus at 60% in round one and the new topics proceeded to the second round. In the second and final round, participants ranked the suggested competencies. Descriptive statistics and a McNemar change test were utilized to analyze data. Only data from the participants who completed both rounds was used in the study.MethodsA two round modified Delphi technique was administered to 29 clinical pharmacologists within the Office of Clinical Pharmacology (OCP) between November 2021-January 2022.A questionnaire consisting of core and technical competencies was administered electronically using SurveyMonkey (R) to gain consensus about essential clinical pharmacology competencies. Participants used a Likert scale to rank importance of competencies from strongly agree (1), agree (2), neutral (3), disagree (4), strongly disagree (5). Participants also suggested topics to be included in the next round. Consensus was set at 60%. The competencies receiving the most consensus at 60% in round one and the new topics proceeded to the second round. In the second and final round, participants ranked the suggested competencies. Descriptive statistics and a McNemar change test were utilized to analyze data. Only data from the participants who completed both rounds was used in the study.ResultsIn round one participants ranked all fifty-six core and technical competencies as essential with consensus of at least 60%. In round two, participants ranked sixty-two competencies as essential with consensus of at least 60%. A McNemar change test demonstrated stability of ranking between rounds.ConclusionEssential core and technical competencies can build education programs to sustain the emerging clinical pharmacology workforce in the Office of Clinical Pharmacology. The Delphi technique is a suitable approach to determine essential competencies because it cultivates consensus and gains insight from experts in the forefront of drug development.

A Modified Delphi Study to Establish Essential Clinical Pharmacology Competencies

Files and links (1)

Abstract

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

InCites Highlights

A Modified Delphi Study to Establish Essential Clinical Pharmacology Competencies

Files and links (1)

Abstract

Metrics

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

InCites Highlights

Drexel University Social media