Logo image
A Multi-Site Study of Brief Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Eating Disorders for Individuals With BMI ≥ 30
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A Multi-Site Study of Brief Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy for Eating Disorders for Individuals With BMI ≥ 30

Ashley Dunford, P. Evelyna Kambanis, Lilian P. Palmer, Haley Graver, Megan E. Liu, Jordan Hillard, Stefania Yee, Hannah Turner, Lauren Breithaupt, Emma Evans, …
European eating disorders review
05 Apr 2026
PMID: 41937408
url
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC13133702/View
Submitted Open PubMed Central

Abstract

Life Sciences & Biomedicine Psychology, Clinical Science & Technology Psychiatry Psychology Social Sciences
Objective Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) for eating disorders (EDs) has raised concerns of appropriateness for patients in higher-weight bodies. We evaluated acceptability (Sample 1-United States [USA]) and effectiveness (Sample 1-USA, Sample 2-United Kingdom [UK]) of CBT-T by body mass index [BMI] category. We hypothesised that individuals with BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) would be more likely to drop out and show smaller symptom reductions compared to participants with BMI < 30 kg/m(2). Methods Participants with non-underweight EDs (USA: n = 63; UK: n = 58) received CBT-T and completed the ED-15 to evaluate change in behaviours (objective binge eating, purging, restriction, excessive exercise) and cognitions (Eating Concern, Weight/Shape Concern, Global Score). Results Contrary to hypotheses, CBT-T completion did not differ by BMI category. Participants demonstrated large and significant reductions in binge eating, excessive exercise, and ED cognitions, with no significant differences by BMI (USA, UK). Although the BMI >= 30 kg/m(2) group demonstrated significantly smaller reductions in restriction and purging (UK only), smaller reductions in the higher-weight group were fully explained by their significantly lower pre-treatment symptoms. Discussion Results from this exploratory multisite study found no evidence that CBT-T was less acceptable or effective for participants in higher-weight bodies.

Metrics

3 Record Views
1 readers on Mendeley

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#5 Gender Equality
#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs in the Output

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychiatry
Psychology, Clinical
Logo image