Logo image
A comparative evaluation of two subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) analysis methods
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A comparative evaluation of two subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) analysis methods

Hailee Mayer, Priscilla Machado, Trang Vu, Annalisa Berzigotti, Jaume Bosch, Elton Dajti, Antonina Antonenko, Kirk Wallace and Flemming Forsberg
Ultrasonics, v 159, 107840
01 Mar 2026
PMID: 41046629
url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2025.107840View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Portal hypertension SHAPE Subharmonic UCAs Ultrasound
Pressure measurement in clinical practice is a valuable tool for diagnostic evaluation, especially in diseases such as portal hypertension. Currently, portal pressures are measured by invasive hepatic vein catheterization, posing risks to patients, and limiting how often measurements can be obtained. Subharmonic-aided pressure estimation (SHAPE) is an ultrasound-based technique that leverages ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) to estimate changes in hydrostatic pressure. UCAs act as nonlinear oscillators when exposed to high enough acoustic pressures (typically > 200 kPa) and produce significant energy components ranging from subharmonics to higher harmonics. Tissues do not generate significant subharmonic components, thus making it the optimal component for SHAPE. SHAPE is performed using subharmonic imaging complimented by an acoustic pressure optimization algorithm to induce the highest sensitivity to hydrostatic pressure in the UCAs. Traditionally, multiple acquisitions of contrast clips are used to identify the subharmonic amplitude and calculate SHAPE parameters, but recently, a faster method of SHAPE has been proposed, utilizing only the acoustic pressure optimization algorithm to obtain subharmonic amplitudes. The objective of this work is to compare the two methods, SHAPE and fast-SHAPE, in the same patients, to explore the utility of fast-SHAPE.

Metrics

1 Record Views

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

Source: SDGs in the Output

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Industry collaboration
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Acoustics
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Logo image