Logo image
A comparison of the effects of a chlamydial vaccine administered during or after a C. muridarum urogenital infection of female mice
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A comparison of the effects of a chlamydial vaccine administered during or after a C. muridarum urogenital infection of female mice

Alison Carey, Kelly Cunningham, Dean Andrew, Louise Hafner, Peter Timms and Kenneth Beagley
Vaccine, v 29(38), pp 6505-6513
02 Sep 2011
PMID: 21767592
url
https://eprints.qut.edu.au/43942/2/43942.pdfView
SubmittedCC BY-NC-ND V4.0 Open

Abstract

Immunology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medicine, Research & Experimental Research & Experimental Medicine Science & Technology
Research into an efficacious Chlamydia trachomatis vaccine is ongoing, however, there has been no examination into the timing of vaccine administration to either asymptomatically or previously infected individuals. Using the female Chlamydia muridarum genital tract mouse model, we examined this aspect of vaccine development. Our results show timing of vaccination affected the production of systemic antibodies, but had minimal effects on mucosal antibody production. Vaccination during an active infection or after a resolved infection did not provide protection against re-exposure to Chlamydia, and did not exacerbate the development of pathological sequelae in infected mice. This demonstrates that vaccination may not be protective in individuals who are seropositive for an acute or previous chlamydial infection. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Metrics

6 Record Views
7 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Immunology
Medicine, Research & Experimental
Logo image