Logo image
A comparison of two calibration methods for ultrasonic hydrophones
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A comparison of two calibration methods for ultrasonic hydrophones

William B. Gloersen, Gerald R. Harris, Harold F. Stewart and Peter A. Lewin
Ultrasound in medicine & biology, v 8(5), pp 545-548
1982
PMID: 7147468

Abstract

Ultrasonic calibration Ultrasonic transducer
Although miniature ultrasonic hydrophones are frequently used to measure the acoustic pressure distributions from diagnostic ultrasound sources, relatively little attention has been devoted to the methods for absolute calibration of these hydrophones. In this study a polyvinylidene (PVDF) hydrophone was used to compare two calibration methods currently in use. One is based on a reciprocity technique and the second involves the planar scanning of a source transducer having a known radiated ultrasonic power. The reciprocity method revealed that the hydrophone response did not vary by more than ± 1.6dB from −262.8dB re 1V/μPa over the frequency range of 1–10 MHz. For the planar scanning technique seven ultrasound sources between 1–10 MHz were used, and all calibration points were within ±0.5 dB of the corresponding points found by the method of reciprocity.

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Acoustics
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Logo image