Logo image
A content analysis from a US statewide survey of memorable healthcare decisions for individuals with intellectual disability
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A content analysis from a US statewide survey of memorable healthcare decisions for individuals with intellectual disability

Kathleen M Fisher, Michael J Green, Fredrick K Orkin and Vernon M Chinchilli
Journal of intellectual & developmental disability, v 34(3)
2009
PMID: 19681006
url
https://europepmc.org/articles/pmc2862000View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified) Open

Abstract

Background Little is known about surrogate healthcare decision-making for individuals with intellectual disability (ID). This study examined healthcare decision-making by residential-agency directors to learn their process and the extent to which the individual is included. Method Content analysis of qualitative data from a mailed survey of residential-agency directors in a large US northeastern state. Results Narrative comments of 102 directors (65% of respondents) are reported. Three themes emerged: (a) Identifying someone else's "best interest" is challenging; (b) Perceptions of the healthcare community, especially related to quality of life, can influence care provided; and (c) Surrogate decision-making is a team effort. Conclusions With knowledge of how decisions are made, the healthcare community can better interact with the complex array of service agencies and persons who determine care for this vulnerable population.

Metrics

9 Record Views
6 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Education, Special
Rehabilitation
Logo image