Logo image
A corner store intervention to improve access to fruits and vegetables in two Latino communities
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A corner store intervention to improve access to fruits and vegetables in two Latino communities

Stephanie L Albert, Brent A Langellier, Mienah Z Sharif, Alec M Chan-Golston, Michael L Prelip, Rosa Elena Garcia, Deborah C Glik, Thomas R Belin, Ron Brookmeyer and Alexander N Ortega
Public health nutrition, v 20(12), pp 2249-2259
Aug 2017
PMID: 28578744
Featured in Collection :   UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
url
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980017001008View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open
url
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980017001008View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Adolescent Adult Aged California Consumer Behavior Cross-Sectional Studies Diet Female Follow-Up Studies Food Supply Fruit Health Behavior Hispanic Americans Humans Los Angeles Male Marketing Middle Aged Residence Characteristics Socioeconomic Factors Vegetables Young Adult
Investments have been made to alter the food environment of neighbourhoods that have a disproportionate number of unhealthy food venues. Corner store conversions are one strategy to increase access to fruits and vegetables (F&V). Although the literature shows modest success, the effectiveness of these interventions remains equivocal. The present paper reports on the evaluation of Proyecto MercadoFRESCO, a corner store conversion intervention in two Latino communities. A repeated cross-sectional design was employed. Data were stratified by intervention arm and bivariate tests assessed changes over time. Logistic and multiple regression models with intervention arm, time and the interaction of intervention and time were conducted. Supplementary analyses account for clustering of patrons within stores and staggering of store conversions. Three stores were converted and five stores served as comparisons in East Los Angeles and Boyle Heights, California, USA. Store patrons were interviewed before (n550) and after (n407) the intervention. Relative to patrons of comparison stores, patrons of intervention stores demonstrated more favourable perceptions of corner stores and increased purchasing of F&V during that store visit. Changes were not detected in store patronage, percentage of weekly dollars spent on food for F&V or daily consumption of F&V. Consistent with some extant food environment literature, findings demonstrate limited effects. Investments should be made in multilevel, comprehensive interventions that target a variety retail food outlets rather than focusing on corner stores exclusively. Complementary policies limiting the availability, affordability and marketing of energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods should also be pursued.

Metrics

15 Record Views
24 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Nutrition & Dietetics
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Logo image