Logo image
A dissonant scale: stress recognition in the SAQ
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A dissonant scale: stress recognition in the SAQ

Jennifer A Taylor and Ravi Pandian
BMC research notes, v 6(1), pp 302-302
31 Jul 2013
PMID: 23902850
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-6-302View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Attitude of Health Personnel Reproducibility of Results Occupational Health Humans Health Personnel - psychology Psychometrics Factor Analysis, Statistical Safety Management - methods Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Stress, Psychological - psychology Stress, Psychological - diagnosis Job Satisfaction Group Processes Perception Surveys and Questionnaires Recognition (Psychology) Interpersonal Relations Workplace - psychology
Our previous analyses using the Stress Recognition subscale of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) resulted in significant effect estimates with equally opposing explanations. We suspected construct validity issues and investigated such using our own data and correlation matrices of previous published studies. The correlation matrices for each of the SAQ subscales from two previous studies by Speroff and Taylor were replicated and compared. The SAS Proc Factor procedure and the PRIORS = SMC option were used to perform Common Factor Analysis. The correlation matrices of both studies were very similar. Teamwork, Safety Climate, Job Satisfaction, Perceptions of Management and Working Conditions were well-correlated. The correlations ranged from 0.53 to 0.76. For Stress Recognition correlations ranged from -0.15 to 0.03. Common Factor Analysis confirmed the isolation of Stress Recognition. CFA returned a strong one-factor model that explained virtually all of the communal variance. Stress Recognition loaded poorly on this factor in both instances, and the CFA indicated that 96.4-100.0% of the variance associated with Stress Recognition was unique to that subscale, and not shared with the other 5 subscales. We conclude that the Stress Recognition subscale does not fit into the overall safety climate construct the SAQ intended to reflect. We recommend that this domain be omitted from overall safety climate scale score calculations, and clearly identified as an important yet distinct organizational construct. We suggest that this subscale be investigated for its true meaning, characterized as such, and findings conveyed to SAQ end users. We make no argument against Stress Recognition as an important organizational metric, rather we suggest that as a stand-alone construct its current packaging within the SAQ may be misleading for those intent on intervention development and evaluation in healthcare settings if they interpret Stress Recognition results as emblematic of safety climate.

Metrics

15 Record Views
32 citations in Scopus

Details

Logo image