Logo image
A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for individual research output evaluation with maximum consensus
Journal article   Peer reviewed

A fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for individual research output evaluation with maximum consensus

Zongmin Li, Merrill Liechty, Jiuping Xu and Benjamin Lev
Knowledge-based systems, v 56
01 Jan 2014

Abstract

Computer Science Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence Science & Technology Technology
Individual research output (IRO) evaluation is both practically and theoretically. important. Current research tends to only consider either bibliometric measures or peer review in IRO evaluation. This paper argues that bibliometric measures and peer review should be applied simultaneously to evaluate IRO. Moreover, in real life situations IRO evaluations are often made by groups and inevitably contain evaluators' subjective judgments. Accordingly, this paper develops a fuzzy multi-criteria group evaluation method which considers objective and subjective evaluations, i.e., bibliometric measures and peer review opinions simultaneously. The goals here are to conquer weighting difficulty and achieve maximum group consensus. This requires determining criteria weights, which we do with an intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging operator and then determining evaluator weights, which we do with a fuzzy distance-based method. Thereafter, we use a revised TOPSIS method to aggregate the objective and subjective ratings. A practical case study is used to test the feasibility of the methodology. Finally, we discuss the effectiveness of the proposed method. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Metrics

11 Record Views
20 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence
Logo image