Logo image
A narrative review on the validity of electronic health record-based research in epidemiology
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A narrative review on the validity of electronic health record-based research in epidemiology

Milena A. Gianfrancesco and Neal D. Goldstein
BMC medical research methodology, v 21(1)
27 Oct 2021
PMID: 34706667
url
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01416-5View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)CC BY V4.0 Open

Abstract

Health Care Sciences & Services Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology
Electronic health records (EHRs) are widely used in epidemiological research, but the validity of the results is dependent upon the assumptions made about the healthcare system, the patient, and the provider. In this review, we identify four overarching challenges in using EHR-based data for epidemiological analysis, with a particular emphasis on threats to validity. These challenges include representativeness of the EHR to a target population, the availability and interpretability of clinical and non-clinical data, and missing data at both the variable and observation levels. Each challenge reveals layers of assumptions that the epidemiologist is required to make, from the point of patient entry into the healthcare system, to the provider documenting the results of the clinical exam and follow-up of the patient longitudinally; all with the potential to bias the results of analysis of these data. Understanding the extent of as well as remediating potential biases requires a variety of methodological approaches, from traditional sensitivity analyses and validation studies, to newer techniques such as natural language processing. Beyond methods to address these challenges, it will remain crucial for epidemiologists to engage with clinicians and informaticians at their institutions to ensure data quality and accessibility by forming multidisciplinary teams around specific research projects.

Metrics

15 Record Views
103 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Health Care Sciences & Services
Logo image