Logo image
Back
A systematic review of stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary metastases
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

A systematic review of stereotactic radiosurgery for pituitary metastases

Trent Kite, Nikitha Harikumar, Stephen Jaffee, Henry Knox, John Herbst, Stephen Karlovits, Alexander Yu, Jody Leonardo, Rodney E Wegner and Matthew J Shepard
Journal of neuro-oncology, v 176(3), 174
21 Jan 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-026-05424-7
PMID: 41563523
Featured in Collection :   Research Supported by Drexel Libraries' OA Programs
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-026-05424-7View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Open Access via Drexel Libraries Read and Publish Program 2026CC BY V4.0,  Open

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery Cyberknife Pituitary Gamma knife Metastases
Background Pituitary gland metastases (PGM) are extremely rare, and their ideal management is poorly defined. Radiosurgery for PGM may obviate the need for tumor excision, decreasing surgical morbidity in a patient population with an otherwise life-limiting illness. Given this, we sought to summarize existing literature on outcomes of PGM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Methods A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA). PubMed and Science Direct databases were queried from their inception through November 2025. The search phrase “((Stereotactic radiosurgery OR SRS OR radiosurgery) AND (Pituitary metastases))” was applied without any search filters. The primary outcome of interest was local tumor control (LC) with an aggregate local tumor control (LC) point estimate derived by calculating a weighted average across selected studies. Additional outcomes of interest were, post-SRS endocrinological function, and cranial nerve deficits. Results Eight studies encompassing 119 patients with PGM treated with SRS were reviewed. A median tumor volume and diameter of 2.35 cm3, and 2.2 cm respectively was treated with a median prescription dose of 13.0 Gy. The dose delivered to the optic apparatus was <10 Gy in 85.7% of studies. The pooled local control rate following SRS was 90% (95% CI: 75%-99%) over a median follow up of 7 months. A pooled median survival estimate of 14 months (range: 5.2-30.0) was demonstrated. Diabetes insipidus, hypopituitarism, and cranial nerve deficits either improved or were stable following SRS in 50.0%, 53.6%, and 75.0% of patients respectively. Conclusion SRS affords high LC in the setting of PGM. Despite this, survival is poor and likely depends on systemic disease control. A multidisciplinary approach incorporating SRS represents a promising option for this patient population. Further characterization of optimal radiosurgical parameters is warranted.

Metrics

6 Record Views

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Oncology
Logo image