Achieving interface and environment fidelity in the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer
Amine Chellali, Helena Mentis, Amie Miller, Woojin Ahn, Venkata S. Arikatla, Ganesh Sankaranarayanan, Suvranu De, Steven D. Schwaitzberg and Caroline G. L. Cao
International journal of human-computer studies, v 96, pp 22-37
Virtual reality trainers are educational tools with great potential for laparoscopic surgery. They can provide basic skills training in a controlled environment and free of risks for patients. They can also offer objective performance assessment without the need for proctors. However, designing effective. user interfaces that allow the acquisition of the appropriate technical skills on these systems remains a challenge. This paper aims to examine a process for achieving interface and environment fidelity during the development of the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer (VBLaST). Two iterations of the design process were conducted and evaluated. For that purpose, a total of 42 subjects participated in two experimental studies in which two versions of the VBLaST were compared to the accepted standard in the surgical community for training and assessing basic laparoscopic skills in North America, the FLS box trainer. Participants performed 10 trials of the peg transfer task on each trainer. The assessment of task performance was based on the validated FLS scoring method. Moreover, a subjective evaluation questionnaire was used to assess the fidelity aspects of the VBLaST relative to the FLS trainer. Finally, a focus group session with expert surgeons was conducted as a comparative situated evaluation after the first design iteration. This session aimed to assess the fidelity aspects of the early VBLaST prototype as compared to the FLS trainer.
The results indicate that user performance on the earlier version of the VBLaST resulting from the first design iteration was significantly lower than the performance on the standard FLS box-trainer. The comparative situated evaluation with domain experts permitted us to identify some issues related to the visual, haptic and interface fidelity on this early prototype. Results of the second experiment indicate that the performance on the second generation VBLaST was significantly improved as compared to the first generation and not significantly different from that of the standard FLS box-trainer. Furthermore, the subjects rated the fidelity features of the modified VBLaST version higher than the early version. These findings demonstrate the value of the comparative situated evaluation sessions entailing hands on reflection by domain experts to achieve the environment and interface fidelity and training objectives when designing a virtual reality laparoscopic trainer. This suggests that this method could be used successfully in the future to enhance the value of VR systems as an alternative to physical trainers for laparoscopic surgery skills. Some recommendations on how to use this method to achieve the environment and interface fidelity of a VR laparoscopic surgical trainer are identified. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Achieving interface and environment fidelity in the Virtual Basic Laparoscopic Surgical Trainer
Creators
Amine Chellali - Cambridge Health Alliance
Helena Mentis - Cambridge Health Alliance
Amie Miller - Cambridge Health Alliance
Woojin Ahn - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Venkata S. Arikatla - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Ganesh Sankaranarayanan - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Suvranu De - Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Steven D. Schwaitzberg - Harvard University
Caroline G. L. Cao - Wright State University
Publication Details
International journal of human-computer studies, v 96, pp 22-37
Publisher
Elsevier
Number of pages
16
Grant note
NIBIB R01 EB010037-01 / National Institutes of Health (NIH); United States Department of Health & Human Services; National Institutes of Health (NIH) - USA
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Information Science (Informatics)
Web of Science ID
WOS:000384864800003
Scopus ID
2-s2.0-84979747876
Other Identifier
991021916801404721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Cybernetics
Ergonomics
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services