Logo image
Adaptive Evolution and Effective Population Size in Wild House Mice
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Adaptive Evolution and Effective Population Size in Wild House Mice

Megan Phifer-Rixey, François Bonhomme, Pierre Boursot, Gary Churchill, Jaroslav Pialek, Priscilla Tucker and Michael Nachman
Molecular biology and evolution, v 29(10), pp 2949-2955
01 Oct 2012
PMID: 22490822
url
https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss105View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Biodiversity Genetics Life Sciences Populations and Evolution
Estimates of the proportion of amino acid substitutions that have been fixed by selection (a) vary widely among taxa, ranging from zero in humans to over 50% in Drosophila. This wide range may reflect differences in the efficacy of selection due to differences in the effective population size (N e). However, most comparisons have been made among distantly related organisms that differ not only in N e but also in many other aspects of their biology. Here, we estimate a in three closely related lineages of house mice that have a similar ecology but differ widely in N e : Mus musculus musculus (N e ; 25,000-120,000), M. m. domesticus (N e ; 58,000-200,000), and M. m. castaneus (N e ; 200,000-733,000). Mice were genotyped using a high-density single nucleotide polymorphism array, and the proportions of replacement and silent mutations within subspecies were compared with those fixed between each subspecies and an outgroup, Mus spretus. There was significant evidence of positive selection in M. m. castaneus, the lineage with the largest N e , with a estimated to be approximately 40%. In contrast, estimates of a for M. m. domesticus (a 5 13%) and for M. m. musculus (a 5 12 %) were much smaller. Interestingly, the higher estimate of a for M. m. castaneus appears to reflect not only more adaptive fixations but also more effective purifying selection. These results support the hypothesis that differences in N e contribute to differences among species in the efficacy of selection.

Metrics

10 Record Views
66 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
Evolutionary Biology
Genetics & Heredity
Logo image