Logo image
Against Phenomenal Conservatism
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Against Phenomenal Conservatism

Nathan Hanna
Acta analytica : philosophy and psychology, v 26(3), 213
01 Sep 2011
url
https://philpapers.org/archive/HANAPC.pdfView

Abstract

Article Education Epistemology General Logic Metaphysics Philosophy Philosophy of Mind
Recently, Michael Huemer has defended the Principle of Phenomenal Conservatism: If it seems to S that p, then, in the absence of defeaters, S thereby has at least some degree of justification for believing that p. This principle has potentially far-reaching implications. Huemer uses it to argue against skepticism and to defend a version of ethical intuitionism. I employ a reductio to show that PC is false. If PC is true, beliefs can yield justification for believing their contents in cases where, intuitively, they should not be able to do so. I argue that there are cases where a belief that p can behave like an appearance that p and thereby make it seem to one that p.

Metrics

6 Record Views
12 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Philosophy
Logo image