Logo image
An evaluation of standardized patients in improving clinical breast examinations for military women
Journal article   Peer reviewed

An evaluation of standardized patients in improving clinical breast examinations for military women

Elizabeth Ann Coleman, Carol Beth Stewart, Sheryl Wilson, Mary J Cantrell, Patricia O'Sullivan, Dana Oaddams Carthron, Linda C Wood and Shirley A Wilson
Cancer nursing, v 27(6), pp 474-482
Nov 2004
PMID: 15640625

Abstract

Adult Aged Analysis of Variance Arkansas Breast Neoplasms - diagnosis Clinical Competence - standards Education, Nursing, Continuing - methods Education, Nursing, Continuing - standards Female Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Health Services Needs and Demand Humans Male Mass Screening - methods Mass Screening - nursing Mass Screening - standards Medical History Taking - standards Medical Staff - education Medical Staff - psychology Middle Aged Military Nursing - education Nursing Education Research Nursing Staff - education Nursing Staff - psychology Patient Simulation Physical Examination - nursing Physical Examination - standards Physician Assistants - education Physician Assistants - psychology Surveys and Questionnaires Texas
There is a need to improve the quality of clinical breast examination (CBE) and breast cancer screening for women. The purpose of this study was to determine whether instructions from a standardized patient to military healthcare providers would increase the quality of CBE and breast cancer screening for military women. The study used a 2-group pretest and posttest experimental design with random assignment by study site. Before and after the intervention, the providers completed a 13-item survey to assess their current breast cancer screening practices and the standardized patient used an investigator-developed checklist to assess the providers' breast cancer screening performance. The survey of breast cancer screening practice scores and the interview and CBE performance scores were analyzed using analysis of covariance with the pretest scores as covariates. Results showed the experimental group made significantly more improvement than did the control group in their total scores on the observational checklist of interview and CBE skills (F = 19.18, P < .001, observed power = 0.99). In conclusion, this method of continuing education was effective with military healthcare providers.

Metrics

7 Record Views
15 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#5 Gender Equality
#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Nursing
Oncology
Logo image