Logo image
Analysis of arm trajectories of everyday tasks for the development of an upper-limb orthosis
Journal article

Analysis of arm trajectories of everyday tasks for the development of an upper-limb orthosis

Rungun Ramanathan, Silvio Eberhardt, Tariq Rahman, Whitney Sample, Rami Seliktar and Michael Alexander
IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering, v 8(1), pp 60-70
01 Jan 2000
PMID: 10779109

Abstract

Biomechanics Biosensors Degrees of freedom (mechanics) Muscle
Spatiotemporal arm and body movements of able-bodied subjects performing nine everyday tasks were recorded for the purpose of guiding the development of an upper-limb orthosis. To provide a user the opportunity to carry out these tasks with natural movements, the orthosis should allow replication of the measured trajectories. We outline the orthosis architecture, which supports the user's upper arm and forearm, and analyze the movement data to obtain orthosis design specifications. Trajectories were obtained using six-degree-of-freedom magnetic position sensors affixed to the wrist, elbow, shoulder, trunk and head. Elbow trajectory data were decomposed into ranges along the principle Cartesian axes to provide a generally useful envelope measure. The smallest Cartesian parallelepiped that contained the elbow trajectories for most tasks was approximately 30 cm front/back, 15 cm side/side, and 17 cm up /down. A rough lower bound estimate obtained by asking subjects to repeat the tasks while minimizing elbow movement substantially reduced movement in the up/down and side/side dimensions. Elbow angles were generally in the range 50 degree -150 degree , and the angle of the forearm with respect to vertical was 10 degree -110 degree . Raw trajectory data may be downloaded from www://asel.udel.edu/robotics/orthosis /range.html.

Metrics

16 Record Views
22 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Engineering, Biomedical
Rehabilitation
Logo image