Journal article
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with integrated fixation and adjunctive posterior stabilization: A comparative biomechanical analysis
Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), v 30(8), pp 769-774
Oct 2015
PMID: 26169603
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
Interbody fusion cages with integrated fixation components have become of interest due to their ability to provide enhanced post-operative stability and mitigate device migration. A recently approved anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated fixation anchors has yet to be compared in vitro to a standard polyetheretherketone cage when used in combination with an interspinous process clamp.
Twelve human cadaveric lumbar segments were implanted at L4–L5 with a Solus interbody cage (n=6) or standard polyetheretherketone cage (n=6) following Intact testing and discectomy. Each cage was subsequently evaluated in all primary modes of loading after supplementation with the following posterior constructs: interspinous process clamp, bilateral transfacet screws, unilateral transfacet screw with contralateral pedicle screws, and bilateral pedicle screws. Range of motion results were normalized to Intact, and a two-way mixed analysis of variance was utilized to detect statistical differences.
The Solus cage in combination with all posterior constructs provided significant fixation compared to Intact in all loading conditions. The polyetheretherketone cage also provided significant fixation when combined with all screw based treatments, however when used with the interspinous process clamp a significant reduction was not observed in lateral bending or axial torsion.
Interbody cages with integrated fixation components enhance post-operative stability within the intervertebral space, thus affording clinicians the potential to utilize less invasive methods of posterior stabilization when seeking circumferential fusion. Interspinous process clamps, in particular, may reduce peri-operative and post-operative comorbidities compared to screw based constructs. Further study is necessary to corroborate their effectiveness in vivo.
•PEEK ALIF cages traditionally lack stability in torsion and lateral bending.•ALIF cages with integrated supplemental fixation enhance immediate stability.•IPCs adjunct to ALIF cages may provide a stable fusion environment.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with integrated fixation and adjunctive posterior stabilization: A comparative biomechanical analysis
- Creators
- Matthew S. Yeager - Allegheny General HospitalDerrick A. Dupre - Allegheny General HospitalDaniel J. Cook - Allegheny General HospitalMichael Y. Oh - Allegheny General HospitalDaniel T. Altman - Allegheny General HospitalBoyle C. Cheng - Allegheny General Hospital
- Publication Details
- Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), v 30(8), pp 769-774
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Orthopedic/Orthopaedic Surgery; SOM Dean - Research Administration; Surgery
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000362145900001
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-84941424028
- Other Identifier
- 991019169571204721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Collaboration types
- Domestic collaboration
- Web of Science research areas
- Engineering, Biomedical
- Orthopedics
- Sport Sciences