Logo image
Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?

Eliezer Fich and Anil Shivdasani
The Journal of finance (New York), v 61(2), pp 689-724
01 Apr 2006
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00852.xView
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Boards of directors Corporate governance Correlation analysis Financial performance Studies
Firms with busy boards, those in which a majority of outside directors hold three or more directorships, are associated with weak corporate governance. These firms exhibit lower market-to-book ratios, weaker profitability, and lower sensitivity of CEO turnover to firm performance. Independent but busy boards display CEO turnover-performance sensitivities indistinguishable from those of inside-dominated boards. Departures of busy outside directors generate positive abnormal returns (ARs). When directors become busy as a result of acquiring an additional directorship, other companies in which they hold board seats experience negative ARs. Busy outside directors are more likely to depart boards following poor performance. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]

Metrics

21 Record Views
1174 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Business, Finance
Economics
Logo image