Logo image
Back
Assessing cancer programs' financial resources for rural cancer patients
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Assessing cancer programs' financial resources for rural cancer patients

Victoria Marie Petermann, Robin C. Vanderpool, Jan Marie Eberth, Catherine Rohweder, Randall Teal, Lindsay Stradtman, Elizabeth Frost, Erika Trapl, Sarah Koopman Gonzalez, Thuy Vu, …
Journal of clinical oncology, v 37(27_suppl), pp 165-165
20 Sep 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2019.37.27_suppl.165

Abstract

Abstract only 165 Background: The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has identified rural cancer control as a research priority. Rural patients may have greater cancer-related financial burdens due to high travel costs, low insurance coverage, and less flexible work schedules. To better understand geographic differences in cancer-related financial toxicity from an organizational perspective, we interviewed staff from a range of cancer treatment settings in counties across the rural-urban continuum. The goal was to qualitatively assess the financial resources available to cancer patients, particularly those residing in rural areas. Methods: Seven research teams within the Cancer Prevention and Research Control Network interviewed personnel providing financial navigation services across four types of cancer care facilities and three urban/rural classifications. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. We identified themes using inductive content analysis. A total of 28 interviews were collected across 7 states and preliminary results have been generated from 20 interviews. Results: Study participants identified transportation and housing costs as primary financial stressors for rural patients. A few personnel from centers in urban counties did not observe clear differences in experiences of financial toxicity between rural and urban patients. No personnel mentioned resources that are long-term or specifically for rural patients. Gas cards and temporary housing are often provided to help rural and urban patients access treatment. Insufficient staffing is a barrier to addressing patients’ financial concerns in rural and urban centers. Urban institutions, particularly NCI-designated facilities, employ more cancer-specific financial navigators than rural institutions. Conclusions: Patients across the rural-urban continuum experience financial hardship, but rural patients may be disproportionately affected by transportation and housing costs. Improving transportation and housing support may improve their ability to access treatment. Financial navigation practices within states vary; thus, patients and cancer centers may benefit from more streamlined approaches to address financial needs for all cancer patients.

Metrics

10 Record Views

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Oncology
Logo image