Logo image
Assessing diagnostic criteria for active infective endocarditis
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Assessing diagnostic criteria for active infective endocarditis

Jesse A. Berlin, Elias Abrutyn, Brian L. Strom, Judith L. Kinman, Matthew E. Levison, Oksana M. Korzeniowski, Roy S. Feldman and Donald Kaye
The American journal of cardiology, v 73(12), pp 887-891
1994
PMID: 8184814

Abstract

A study was performed to describe agreement among experts on their classification of patients, in the absence of information concerning risk factors, as to the presence of infective endocarditis (IE). The study also assessed the clinical characteristics that enabled the experts to determine that a patient had IE. All patients with a discharge diagnosis of IE were identified prospectively from 54 hospitals in the Delaware Valley over a 3-year period. Patients were part of a case-control study of risk factors for IE. Three infectious disease experts independently reviewed abstracted hospital records and classified each of 151 eligible patients as a definite, probable or possible case, or a probable now case, both based on clinical judgment and using a modified standard definition. Experts were more likely to classify a patient as a definite case of IE on the basis of clinical judgment than by using the modified standard definition. Agreement between reviewers was 92 to 95% when they were distinguishing only probable non-cases from others. Agreement between reviewers on specific categories was lower (40 to 58%). The number of positive blood cultures was a strong predictor of a patient's being classified as a case, as was the type of infecting organism. It is concluded that experts are willing to make a definitive diagnosis of IE on the basis of blood culture information alone. Further supporting evidence, such as the presence of vegetation on an echocardiogram, is needed when blood culture results are ambiguous.

Metrics

7 Record Views
22 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems
Logo image