Logo image
Assessing the Performance of the Framingham Stroke Risk Score in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Cohort
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Assessing the Performance of the Framingham Stroke Risk Score in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke Cohort

Leslie A. McClure, Dawn O. Kleindorfer, Brett M. Kissela, Mary Cushman, Elsayed Z. Soliman and George Howard
Stroke (1970), v 45(6), pp 1716-1720
01 Jun 2014
PMID: 24736237
url
https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.114.004915View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open
url
https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004915View
Published, Version of Record (VoR) Open

Abstract

Cardiovascular System & Cardiology Clinical Neurology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Neurosciences & Neurology Peripheral Vascular Disease Science & Technology
Background and Purpose-The most well-known stroke risk score is the Framingham Stroke Risk Score (FSRS), which was developed during the higher stroke risk period of the 1990s and has not been validated for blacks. We assessed the performance of the FSRS among participants in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study to determine whether it is useful in both blacks and whites. Methods-Expected annualized stroke rates from the FSRS were compared with observed stroke rates overall and within strata defined by FSRS risk factors (age, sex, systolic blood pressure, use of antihypertensive medications, diabetes mellitus, smoking, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, and prevalent coronary heart disease). Results-Among 27 748 participants stroke-free at baseline, 715 stroke events occurred over 5.6 years of follow-up. FSRS-estimated incidence rates of stroke were 1.6x higher than observed for black men, 1.9x higher for white men, 1.7x higher for black women, and 1.7x higher for white women. This overestimation was consistent among most subgroups of FSRS factors, although the magnitude of overestimation varied by the risk factor assessed. Conclusions-Although higher FSRS was associated with higher stroke risk, the FSRS overestimated the observed stroke rates in this study, particularly in certain subgroups. This may be because of temporal declines in stroke rates, secular trends in prevention treatments, or differences in populations studied. More accurate estimates of event rates are critical for planning research, including clinical trials, and targeting health-care efforts.

Metrics

20 Record Views
25 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Clinical Neurology
Peripheral Vascular Disease
Logo image