Journal article
Assessing the "evolving standards of decency:" perceptions of capital punishment for juveniles
Behavioral sciences & the law, v 24(2)
2006
PMID: 16557619
Featured in Collection : UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
Abstract
This study examines whether public opinion parallels recent judicial and statutory changes limiting the applicability of capital sentences to offenders younger than 18 years old. Two hundred and thirty-five undergraduate students were administered a vignette of a capital case and asked to render a sentence of death or life in prison without parole. Results revealed that age of the defendant was not a significant predictor of sentence type; participants sentenced 16- and 17-year-old defendants similarly to 18- and 25-year-old defendants. Therefore, public opinion appears inconsistent with legal and legislative changes to abandon the practice of executing juveniles. Findings also suggested that perceived level of the defendant's responsibility and general opinion about capital sentences significantly predicted sentence type; perceptions of greater responsibility were associated with an increased likelihood of a death sentence. However, participants did not perceive differences in responsibility between juvenile and adult defendants. In addition, participants were more comfortable sentencing defendants to death compared with life in prison.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Assessing the "evolving standards of decency:" perceptions of capital punishment for juveniles
- Creators
- Rachel Kalbeitzer - Department of Psychology, Drexel University, MS 626, 245 North 15th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192, USANaomi E Sevin Goldstein
- Publication Details
- Behavioral sciences & the law, v 24(2)
- Publisher
- Wiley; United States
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences (Psychology)
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:000236870100004
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-33646248631
- Other Identifier
- 991014877997004721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
- Web of Science research areas
- Law
- Psychology, Applied