Logo image
Assessment of a 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents' competency in interpersonal and communication skills
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Assessment of a 360-degree instrument to evaluate residents' competency in interpersonal and communication skills

Raksha Joshi, Frank W Ling and Joseph Jaeger
Academic medicine, v 79(5), pp 458-463
01 May 2004
PMID: 15107286
url
https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200405000-00017View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Abridged Index Medicus
OBJECTIVETo test the reliability of the 360-degree evaluation instrument for assessing residents' competency in interpersonal and communication skills. METHODTen-item questionnaires were distributed to residents and evaluators at Monmouth Medical Center in Long Branch, New Jersey, in March/April, 2002. The scoring scale was 1-5; the highest score was 50. Data were maintained strictly confidential; each resident was assigned a code. Completed data sheets were collated by category and entered into a spreadsheet. The total and mean scores by each category of evaluator were calculated for each resident and a rank order list created. Shrout-Fleiss (model 2) intraclass correlation coefficients measured reliability of ratings within each group of evaluators. Reliability/reproducibility among evaluators' scores were tested by the Pearson correlation coefficient (p <.05). RESULTSIntraclass correlation coefficients showed a narrow range, from.85-.54. The highest ranked resident overall ranked high and the lowest was low with most evaluators. The rank order among fellow residents was markedly different from other evaluator categories. Pearson correlation coefficients showed significant correlation between faculty and ancillary staff, (p =.002). Patients as evaluators did show intraclass correlation, but did not correlate significantly with other categories. Scores from colleagues correlated negatively with all other categories of evaluators. CONCLUSIONSThe 360-degree instrument appears to be reliable to evaluate residents' competency in interpersonal and communication skills. Information from the assessment may provide feedback to residents. Areas of improvement identified by the scores would suggest areas for improvement and further ongoing assessment.

Metrics

5 Record Views
98 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#4 Quality Education

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Education, Scientific Disciplines
Health Care Sciences & Services
Logo image