Attitudes and beliefs about recreational cannabis legalization among cannabis-using young adults in Los Angeles: Impact on concurrent cannabis practices and problematic cannabis use
Carolyn F. Wong, Stephanie E.A. Mendez, Bridgid M. Conn, Ellen Iverson and Stephen E. Lankenau
Attitudes and beliefs Cannabis legalization Cannabis use behaviors Latent class analysis Problematic cannabis use Young adults
This study investigated differences in attitudes and beliefs about recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) among cannabis-using young adults comprised of medical cannabis patients (MCP) and non-patient users (NPU). We further investigated whether these variations are associated with concurrent cannabis practices and problematic use.
Cannabis-using young adults (N = 301) were interviewed between 2017 and 2018 – after RCL and through the early months after storefront sales began. Latent class analysis empirically derived groups based on participants’ attitudes/beliefs about the impact of RCL. Socio-demographic factors, patient status, medicinal and/or recreational use, and social norms differentiated latent class memberships, while concurrent cannabis practices and problematic use served as distal outcomes. The manual Bolck, Croon, and Hagenaars (BCH) three-step process modeled all covariates and distal outcomes simultaneously in the final LCA solution.
Three patterns emerged: Impacted (RCL had broad impact on attitudes/beliefs) (n = 113), Partially-Impacted (RCL had some impact on attitudes/beliefs) (n = 131) and Neutral (RCL had no/limited impact) (n = 57). MCP were more likely to be Neutral than Partially-Impacted users while those who reported recreational cannabis use were more likely to be Impacted than Neutral users. Class membership predicted cannabis practices and problematic use with Impacted individuals reporting the greatest recent days of use, number of hits per day, and highest scores in problematic cannabis use compared to Partially-Impacted and Neutral users.
Variability in attitudes/beliefs about RCL served as strong drivers of concurrent cannabis practices and problematic use. Findings provide an important baseline for tracking attitudes/beliefs’ long-term health and substance use impact as retail cannabis sales evolve.
•We found meaningful differences in young adult cannabis-users’ attitudes/beliefs about recreational cannabis legalization.•The three groups were: “impacted across attitudes/beliefs”, “partially impacted only on attitudes” and “neutral”.•“Impacted” individuals exhibited the highest risk behaviors and reported significantly greater problematic use.•Current findings provide an important baseline to continue tracking attitudes/beliefs’ long-term impact.
Attitudes and beliefs about recreational cannabis legalization among cannabis-using young adults in Los Angeles: Impact on concurrent cannabis practices and problematic cannabis use
Creators
Carolyn F. Wong - Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Stephanie E.A. Mendez - Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Bridgid M. Conn - Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Ellen Iverson - Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Stephen E. Lankenau - Drexel University
Publication Details
Drug and alcohol dependence, v 228, 109053
Publisher
Elsevier
Resource Type
Journal article
Language
English
Academic Unit
Community Health and Prevention
Web of Science ID
WOS:000710197200015
Other Identifier
991019167806604721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
InCites Highlights
Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:
Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychiatry
Substance Abuse
Research Home Page
Browse by research and academic units
Learn about the ETD submission process at Drexel
Learn about the Libraries’ research data management services