Logo image
Back
Attitudes and beliefs about recreational cannabis legalization among cannabis-using young adults in Los Angeles: Impact on concurrent cannabis practices and problematic cannabis use
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Attitudes and beliefs about recreational cannabis legalization among cannabis-using young adults in Los Angeles: Impact on concurrent cannabis practices and problematic cannabis use

Carolyn F. Wong, Stephanie E.A. Mendez, Bridgid M. Conn, Ellen Iverson and Stephen E. Lankenau
Drug and alcohol dependence, v 228, 109053
01 Nov 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.109053
PMID: 34610520
Featured in Collection :   UN Sustainable Development Goals @ Drexel
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11104431View
Accepted (AM)Open Access (License Unspecified),  Open

Abstract

Attitudes and beliefs Cannabis legalization Cannabis use behaviors Latent class analysis Problematic cannabis use Young adults
This study investigated differences in attitudes and beliefs about recreational cannabis legalization (RCL) among cannabis-using young adults comprised of medical cannabis patients (MCP) and non-patient users (NPU). We further investigated whether these variations are associated with concurrent cannabis practices and problematic use. Cannabis-using young adults (N = 301) were interviewed between 2017 and 2018 – after RCL and through the early months after storefront sales began. Latent class analysis empirically derived groups based on participants’ attitudes/beliefs about the impact of RCL. Socio-demographic factors, patient status, medicinal and/or recreational use, and social norms differentiated latent class memberships, while concurrent cannabis practices and problematic use served as distal outcomes. The manual Bolck, Croon, and Hagenaars (BCH) three-step process modeled all covariates and distal outcomes simultaneously in the final LCA solution. Three patterns emerged: Impacted (RCL had broad impact on attitudes/beliefs) (n = 113), Partially-Impacted (RCL had some impact on attitudes/beliefs) (n = 131) and Neutral (RCL had no/limited impact) (n = 57). MCP were more likely to be Neutral than Partially-Impacted users while those who reported recreational cannabis use were more likely to be Impacted than Neutral users. Class membership predicted cannabis practices and problematic use with Impacted individuals reporting the greatest recent days of use, number of hits per day, and highest scores in problematic cannabis use compared to Partially-Impacted and Neutral users. Variability in attitudes/beliefs about RCL served as strong drivers of concurrent cannabis practices and problematic use. Findings provide an important baseline for tracking attitudes/beliefs’ long-term health and substance use impact as retail cannabis sales evolve. •We found meaningful differences in young adult cannabis-users’ attitudes/beliefs about recreational cannabis legalization.•The three groups were: “impacted across attitudes/beliefs”, “partially impacted only on attitudes” and “neutral”.•“Impacted” individuals exhibited the highest risk behaviors and reported significantly greater problematic use.•Current findings provide an important baseline to continue tracking attitudes/beliefs’ long-term impact.

Metrics

6 Record Views
6 citations in Web of Science
6 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#3 Good Health and Well-Being

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Psychiatry
Substance Abuse
Logo image