Logo image
Bank size and market value: The role of direct monitoring and delegation costs
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Bank size and market value: The role of direct monitoring and delegation costs

Panagiotis Avramidis, Christos Cabolis and Konstantinos Serfes
Journal of banking & finance, v 93, pp 127-138
Aug 2018

Abstract

Asymmetric information Bank size Market value Monitoring
Recent studies have presented evidence of scale economies for large banks, providing a rationale for some very large banks seen worldwide. In this study, we focus on the negative side of bank size which relates to monitoring costs. In particular, we show that the relationship between size and bank's market to book value of assets is contained by the cost of the manager to directly monitor the borrowers and by the (delegation) cost of the owner to monitor the bank manager. Using a sample of US bank holding companies from 2001 to 2015, we provide evidence that the relationship between size and bank's market to book value of assets is inverse U-shaped and that monitoring costs offset the benefits from economies of scale.

Metrics

15 Record Views
22 citations in Scopus

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
#10 Reduced Inequalities
#1 No Poverty
#9 Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Business, Finance
Economics
Logo image