Logo image
Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lya forest of BOSS DR11 quasars
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Baryon acoustic oscillations in the Lya forest of BOSS DR11 quasars

Timothee Delubac, Julian E. Bautista, Nicola G. Busca, James Rich, David Kirkby, Stephen Bailey, Andreu Font-Ribera, Anze Slosar, Khee-Gan Lee, Matthew M. Pieri, …
Astronomy and astrophysics (Berlin), v 574
01 Feb 2015
url
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201423969View
Published, Version of Record (VoR)Maybe Open Access (Publisher Bronze) Open

Abstract

Astronomy & Astrophysics Science & Technology ESI Highly Cited Paper (Incites) Physical Sciences
We report a detection of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature in the flux-correlation function of the Ly alpha forest of high-redshift quasars with a statistical significance of five standard deviations. The study uses 137 562 quasars in the redshift range 2.1 <= z <= 3.5 from the data release 11 (DR11) of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) of SDSS-III. This sample contains three times the number of quasars used in previous studies. The measured position of the BAO peak determines the angular distance, D-A(Z = 2.34) and expansion rate, H(z = 2.34), both on a scale set by the sound horizon at the drag epoch, r(d). We find D-A/r(d) = 11.28 +/- 0.65(1 sigma)(-1.2)(+2.8)(2 sigma) and D-H/r(d) = 9.18 +/- 0.28(1 sigma) +/- 0.6(2 sigma) where D-H = c/H. The optimal combination, similar to(DHDA0.3)-D-0.7/r(d) is determined with a precision of similar to 2%. For the value r(d) = 147.4 Mpc, consistent with the cosmic microwave background power spectrum measured by Planck, we find D-A(Z = 2.34) = 1662 +/- 96(1 sigma) Mpc and H(z = 2.34) = 222 +/- 7(1 sigma) km s(-1) Mpc(-1). Tests with mock catalogs and variations of our analysis procedure have revealed no systematic uncertainties comparable to our statistical errors. Our results agree with the previously reported BAO measurement at the same redshift using the quasar-Ly alpha forest cross-correlation. The autocorrelation and cross-correlation approaches are complementary because of the quite different impact of redshift-space distortion on the two measurements. The combined constraints from the two correlation functions imply values of D-A/r(d) that are 7% lower and 7% higher for D-H/r(d) than the predictions of a flat ACDM cosmological model with the best-fit Planck parameters. With our estimated statistical errors, the significance of this discrepancy is approximate to 2.5 sigma.

Metrics

12 Record Views
767 citations in Scopus

Details

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Highly Cited Paper 
Collaboration types
Domestic collaboration
International collaboration
Web of Science research areas
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Logo image