Logo image
Benchmarking blast accuracy of genus/phyla classification of metagenomic reads
Journal article

Benchmarking blast accuracy of genus/phyla classification of metagenomic reads

Steven D Essinger and Gail L Rosen
Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, pp 10-20
2010
PMID: 19908353

Abstract

Crenarchaeota - classification DNA, Archaeal - genetics Metagenomics - statistics & numerical data Crenarchaeota - isolation & purification Humans Computational Biology Metagenomics - methods Phylogeny Sequence Alignment - statistics & numerical data Bacteria - genetics Sequence Alignment - methods Bacteria - isolation & purification Metagenome - genetics Algorithms DNA, Bacterial - genetics Bacteria - classification Crenarchaeota - genetics Databases, Nucleic Acid
Metagenomics is the study of environmental samples. Because few tools exist for metagenomic analysis, a natural step has been to utilize the popular homology tool, BLAST, to search for sequence similarity between sample fragments and an administered database. Most biologists use this method today without knowing BLAST's accuracy, especially when a particular taxonomic class is under-represented in the database. The aim of this paper is to benchmark the performance of BLAST for taxonomic classification of metagenomic datasets in a supervised setting; meaning that the database contains microbes of the same class as the 'unknown' query fragments. We examine well- and under-represented genera and phyla in order to study their effect on the accuracy of BLAST. We conclude that on fine-resolution classes, such as genera, the accuracy of BLAST does not degrade very much with under-representation, but in a highly variant class, such as phyla, performance degrades significantly. Our analysis includes five-fold cross validation to substantiate our findings.

Metrics

3 Record Views

Details

UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:

#15 Life on Land

InCites Highlights

Data related to this publication, from InCites Benchmarking & Analytics tool:

Web of Science research areas
Computer Science, Theory & Methods
Mathematical & Computational Biology
Logo image