Journal article
Beyond named methods: A typology of active learning based on classroom observation networks
Physical review. Physics education research, v 22(1), 010143
01 May 2026
Abstract
A growing number of introductory physics instructors are implementing active learning methods in their classrooms, and they are modifying these methods to fit their local instructional contexts. However, we lack a detailed framework for describing the range of what these instructor adaptations of active learning methods look like in practice. Existing studies apply structured protocols to classroom observations and report descriptive statistics (e.g., the fraction of class time spent on each activity), but this approach overlooks the complex nature of instruction. In this study, we apply network analysis techniques to classroom observations to define a typology of active learning that considers the temporal and interactional nature of instructional practices. We analyze video data from 30 instructors at 27 institutions who implemented one of the following named active learning methods in their introductory physics or astronomy courses: Investigative Science Learning Environment (ISLE), Peer Instruction, Tutorials, and Student-Centered Active Learning Environment with Upside-down Pedagogies (SCALEUP). We first create one classroom observation network per instructor that captures temporal sequences of activities measured using the Classroom Observation Protocol for Undergraduate STEM (COPUS). We then calculate the cosine similarity between all pairs of observation networks, create a similarity network where each instructor's classroom observation network is a node and the edges represent cosine similarity, and apply the Infomap clustering algorithm to the similarity network to identify types of active learning instruction. We find five types of instruction: clicker lecture, dialogic clicker lecture, dialogic lecture with short groupwork activities, short groupwork activities, and long groupwork activities. We find no significant relationship between these instruction types and the named active learning methods; instead, implementations of each of the four methods are spread across different instruction types. This result prompts a shift in the way we discuss and study active learning: the names of developed active learning methods may not actually reflect classroom instruction. We also find that student conceptual learning does not vary across the identified instruction types, suggesting that instructors may be flexible in the style in which they implement these methods without sacrificing effectiveness. We discuss the implications of these results for both research and the professional development of college physics instructors.
Metrics
Details
- Title
- Beyond named methods: A typology of active learning based on classroom observation networks
- Creators
- Meagan Sundstrom (Corresponding Author) - Drexel UniversityJustin Gambrell - Michigan State UniversityColin Green - Bryn Mawr CollegeAdrienne L. Traxler - University of CopenhagenEric Brewe - Drexel University
- Publication Details
- Physical review. Physics education research, v 22(1), 010143
- Publisher
- American Physical Society
- Number of pages
- 23
- Grant note
- Cotswold Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship at Drexel University 2111128; 2111275 / National Science Foundation; National Science Foundation (NSF)
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Physics; School of Education
- Web of Science ID
- WOS:001782371300001
- Scopus ID
- 2-s2.0-105042501139
- Other Identifier
- 991022195559604721
UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
This publication has contributed to the advancement of the following goals:
Source: SDGs in the Output